Monthly Archives: November 2008

New team training workshop

It’s always exciting to start training a new group of people on teamwork and last week was the first of 4 half-day sessions on team development with the program MY Team and I. This training program incorporates the threebrainsynergy approach to knowing oneself and others. The knowledge of self and each other is a core element of this program for a good reason that I will describe later in this post.

The group is made up of new employees of a small company that provides computer detailed drawings of steel structures for builders and steel fabricators. The company is very young and the owner/entrepreneur has grown the business quickly and already has diversified to include a small shop that cuts steel for fabricators. He is also working on a project to bring a huge innovation to the marketplace by introducing robotics into the fabrication process. This sharp businessman realizes the importance of training and development and of teamwork and thus wants his new hires to go through the same program he and the other staff has.

One aspect of the first session was focused on having each person explore the difference between a group and a team of people working together. What do you think is the difference?

Essentially there is one huge but not obvious difference that makes a team’s performance far superior to a groups’. A team of people know each other more profoundly and have greater affinity. They also want to help and support each other, not only because they want to succeed, but because they really care about each other. So how do you achieve this?

The answer is to have the team members learn, discover who they are and grow together. This way they get to understand why each person is different and how to best work and support that person. They get to understand the needs and the style of their teammates and can then use specific teamwork and communication techniques appropriately. They also learn the importance of making sure that every member of the team feels heard and important. Groups of people working together to not go to these extents to learn about and support each other.

In the MY Team and I program, the learning about oneself and others is done in an interactive exercise that introduces people to their type based on the threebrainsynergy approach. So it is not a test with reports but an engaging shared experiential activity. This is also explained in the book CrazyZoo, Know-Thyself Made Easy by Fritz Glaus who also created the training program.

In the last session I also covered the 4 stages of team development, which goes from dependency on the supervisor, which is not really teamwork at all, to interdependence. But in order to get to that stage the team members need to learn specific skills. Each team member needs to commit to practicing and applying these skills or the organization will never reach the highest stage where synergistic performance happens.

In order for the team members to properly apply the new skills of teamwork, which I will elaborate on in future posts and articles, they must become more balanced in the use of their three brains or intelligences. To do this they learn about their types and choose a tendency they want to work on that will unblock what may be holding them back to fully use their qualities and be more balanced.

In the last workshop each person chose their type and identified a tendency to work on. This was shared openly and they were assigned the task of observing themselves from the perspective of this new knowledge of their type.

Imagine now if everyone in an organization learned this approach and began working on becoming more balanced. Combine that with another goal to develop a crucial teamwork skill and you will have an organization that is primed for high performance.

In the next workshop, I will take them through the process of setting a goal to develop a new behavior that is contrary to the tendency they want to overcome. Each person will have an opportunity to share what they have observed about themselves and others from this new perspective.

This new team training went very well because each person came with an open mind and ready to learn. This tells me the company has done a good job in hiring the right people to fit the job and company culture. Stay tuned for more on this team training.

Stephen Goldberg

Where do we go from here?

Now that the US has elected a new President that everyone hopes will set the world on the right track, it is time to get back to business. I noticed this morning driving to work that the gas prices had fallen to the lowest level in at least 2-3 years. I wonder today how investors will respond to yesterdays election results.

To fix the world however is going to take a lot more than electing an intelligent and charming President. Human beings tend to depend much to much on governments and popular people to solve the problems. This is dangerous because by doing this we absolve ourselves of taking personal responsibility to fix what we have the most control over.  We have the most control over ourselves and our way of responding to what is going on around us. We can choose our response and change the outcome of any situation for ourselves and others. This is a simple yet profound concept but not widely practiced. Here is an example of something that happened yesterday and the choices that led to a negative outcome.

I had setup an interview with a businessman to profile his business for a business magazine. The business has been in operation for 57 years by the same owner and he is one of very few who still makes made to measure top quality men’s clothing all by hand.

The interviewer had agreed beforehand that I would videotape the interview and take pictures for her business magazine. I wanted to use the video for my website and to give to the business owner as a keepsake. I was in the process of setting up my equipment when the interviewer arrived and the businessman immediately starting showing her around to explain what they did.

A few minutes later he got interrupted with a call and the interviewer came over to me to tell me to follow her with my camera because she was recording everything he was saying and would use that to write her article. At first I said that she should finish the tour and then sit down for a formal interview that I could record, but I quickly agreed to follow them with my camera.

As we were touring the premises and he was introducing her to the staff and explaining what they did, I pointed the camera at her as she was asking a question. She immediately put her hand in front of the lens to block me from videotaping her and said she did not want to be taped. I turned the camera away and said fine. However, I had missed the answer to a question from an employee and repeated the question so I could record the important answer. The interviewer snapped at me and told me to stop and that I was interfering with her interview and not to ask questions.

I snapped back at her for lashing out at me and doing so in public made me respond even harsher than I should have. Later as we were waiting for the businessman to take care of another task, we got into a brief exchange about what had happened and again she fired away at me. I stood up for myself and told her what I thought of her. She immediately responded what I considered to be like a child and got up and said, that’s it I’m leaving and without further word to anyone just left.

The businessman and employees noticed what happened and could not believe that she would respond in this manner and just take off. I later called her boss to inform him about what had happened as the business owner wanted to know if they would still use the interview for the magazine. These situations and exchanges occurs in some form or another everyday in many organizations and families between so called adults. The outcome of this true story could have been very different. She could have explained in a respectful way that she did not want to be videotaped and propose a solution for me to catch what I needed on tape. After all, she had agreed beforehand to the video. Perhaps I as well could have asked her aside to tell her what I thought of her way of speaking to me.

It realy boils down to communication. But good communication requires mature behavior from two or more adults who are not dominated by fear. Fear is what causes us to behave immaturely to situations. Even if someone like the interviewer would agree to training and coaching on how to communicate well, without first sorting out the cause of her fear, she will never be able to properly apply and maintain better communication skills.

To free oneself of fears that hinder us from acting in a mature way requires self-knowledge and understanding. We need to know our type, the qualities and dominant fear of that type and how to get rid of the the negative tendency.

I know her type from behaviors I have observed in the past and in the Three Brain Synergy system we call it the Innovator. The main motivation of this type is ideas and the main fear is lack of control. This was very clearly displayed by the interviewer and she had let her fear overtake her in that moment and cuased the situation to immediately break down. This of course triggered my fears and I went into self-protection mode and my behaqviour deteriorated as well.

If every person could discover their type and learn to work on their fear, we could then learn how to collaborate using all the greatest tools and techniques that are out there. But unitl then many will defer their personal responsibility for change to the politicians and powerful influencers.

To learn more about the types of people approach you can read CrazyZoo by Fritz Glaus or visit ThreeBrainSynergy and take the e-learning demo lesson. However, the demo lesson only acts as an introduction, while the book covers the types in depth.

Stephen Goldberg