The Hidden Costs of Firing: Why Companies Get It Wrong
Let’s face it—firing employees has never been an easy task. No manager enjoys breaking the news, and no employee wants to hear those dreaded words. Over time, companies have tried various tactics to soften the process or make it more efficient. But are these approaches truly effective? Or are they causing more harm than good?
The Evolution of Firing Strategies
Historically, companies have employed different strategies to encourage underperforming employees to leave. Some methods were subtle, while others were outright manipulative. According to a recent podcast by The Economist, businesses have experimented with:
- Passive Demotions & Unpleasant Work Environments: Some companies make employees want to quit by reassigning them to dull tasks, reducing their responsibilities, or creating uncomfortable workspaces.
- Cash Incentives to Leave: Amazon was known for offering employees money to quit, but this approach backfired as new hires exploited the system—taking jobs merely to receive the payout.
- Motivational Workshops: A newer approach involves inviting employees to workshops that help them identify their life goals and personal motivations. By comparing these motivations to their current job responsibilities, employees often realize the job isn’t a good fit and voluntarily resign.
These strategies may seem creative, but they don’t address the root problem: poor hiring practices.
The Real Solution: Hiring Smarter with Data
Instead of finding ways to encourage employees to quit, companies should focus on hiring the right people in the first place. A strong hiring process eliminates the need for awkward terminations and costly turnover. The key? Using psychometric assessments to match candidates to the right roles.
Psychometric assessments, like the PXT Select, provide valuable insights into a candidate’s thinking style, behavioral traits, and interests—helping employers determine job fit with precision. For instance, if a role requires strong enterprising and people-service skills, the assessment ensures candidates possess those qualities before they are hired.
Matching employees to jobs based on scientifically backed data ensures:
- Higher motivation and job satisfaction
- Increased productivity and engagement
- Lower turnover rates and hiring costs
Why This Matters More Than Ever
Businesses are increasingly driven by data in all aspects—marketing, finance, and customer experience. Yet, many still rely on traditional hiring methods that don’t incorporate meaningful analytics. A poorly matched hire leads to wasted resources, frustration, and ultimately—another round of terminations.
By practicing prevention instead of reaction, companies can build stronger teams, avoid messy firings, and foster a workplace where employees thrive.
Want to See Job Fit in Action?
If you’re curious about how psychometric assessments work, you can request a test run through this link. I also have other videos covering the PXT Select and hiring best practices, which you’ll find linked below.
If you found this article insightful, consider subscribing for more workplace strategies. Thanks for reading—let’s build smarter, stronger teams together!